Elizaldy “Zaldy” Salcedo Co born on December 8, 1970, is a Filipino businessman and politician. He juggled roles as the CEO of the Sunwest Group and Chairman of Misibis Bay Resort, before stepping into politics as a representative for the Ako Bicol Partylist in the Philippine House of Representatives in 2019. He resigned in 2025.

Born on December 8, 1970, Zaldy Co’s early education began at Bicol University’s lab school in Legazpi, followed by studies at St. Gregory the Great Seminary in Tabaco. He then pursued higher education, earning a computer engineering degree from AMA Computer College and later a Master of Business Administration from Aquinas University in 1998.

In 1997, Zaldy Co, together with his brother Christopher “Kito” Co, established the Sunwest Construction and Development Corporation (SCDC), which later evolved into Sunwest Inc., a diversified powerhouse in real estate, energy, and tourism. However, Co’s journey hasn’t been without its storms. In 2002, a cargo ship under his ownership tragically sank in Albay Gulf, leading to a missing person. Later, in the 2000s, Sunwest became a prominent contractor during President Arroyo’s administration, securing significant government projects. Yet, this success was shadowed by allegations of fraudulent river projects and misuse of funds intended for disaster relief, sparking controversy and raising questions about the company’s practices. 

In 2008, Co’s proposal for three mini hydroelectric plants in Catanduanes sparked a debate, with Governor Cua supporting the plan and energy commissioner Rodolfo Albano Jr. opposing it. Despite the opposition, the Department of Energy approved the project, and by 2011, two of the plants, built by Co’s company Suweco, were operational. The following year, Sunwest’s acquisition of Jose Mari Chan’s Hyatt Regency Hotel in Pasay raised eyebrows. The hotel was rebranded as Midas Hotel and Casino and reopened in December 2010. However, in 2013, Sunwest and Hi-Tone, companies linked to the Co siblings, faced scrutiny over unfinished DPWH infrastructure projects in Albay that had already been fully paid for. The controversy deepened in 2014 when the Commission on Audit investigated both construction companies for their alleged involvement in the pork barrel scam, with each company reportedly receiving over ₱1 billion in DPWH projects funded by the Priority Development Assistance Fund of congressmen from 2009 to 2010. From 2016 to 2025, Sunwest secured a massive ₱86.1 billion in contracts, with almost half concentrated in the Bicol Region, including contracts for landslide facilities at the Bicol International Airport. Co divested from SCDC in 2019 but retains a beneficial ownership.

Journey of Co: A Political Timeline Through the 18th to 20th Congress in the Philippines

Inauguration as Ako Bicol Party-List Representative

On June 30, 2019, the inauguration of Co as the Ako Bicol party-list representative marked a significant milestone in the political landscape of the Philippines. Representing the Bicol region, Co stepped into the House of Representatives with a clear mandate from the people, emphasizing the importance of raising the concerns of his constituents at a national level. The Ako Bicol party-list itself aims to uplift the voices from Bicol, ensuring that their needs and aspirations are recognized in national policy discussions.

Co’s role as a representative carries considerable weight, as it is not merely a title but a profound responsibility to serve the interests of the Bicolano populace. Among the pivotal objectives set forth during this period was the focus on infrastructure development, notably the expedited completion of the Bicol International Airport. This project has been long-awaited by the region and is expected to catalyze economic growth, enhance tourism, and improve overall connectivity for Bicolanos. Co was vocal about the significance of this airport, highlighting its potential to transform the accessibility of the region.

From day one, Co demonstrated a proactive approach towards legislative duties. He assembled a team dedicated to engaging with the community, gathering feedback, and identifying pressing concerns that require immediate attention. His initial actions involved collaborating with stakeholders, governmental agencies, and fellow legislators to push for the necessary funding and administrative support required for the airport’s completion. Co aims not only to address the infrastructure gap but also to elevate the socio-economic status of the region by advocating for initiatives that align with Bicol’s long-term development goals.

Co’s inauguration as the Ako Bicol party-list representative symbolizes a new chapter for the Bicol region in the national legislative arena. By prioritizing key infrastructure projects and establishing a dialogue with constituents, he seeks to lay down a foundation for sustainable progress that can benefit both the present and future generations of Bicolanos.

Role in the 19th Congress: Chairperson of the House Committee on Appropriations

During the 19th Congress of the Philippines, which commenced in 2022, the pivotal role of the Chairperson of the House Committee on Appropriations was assumed by Co, a key figure in legislative processes. This position carries substantial weight in the Philippine government, primarily responsible for the scrutiny of national budget proposals and allocations that directly impact various sectors of society. As the Chairperson, Co’s responsibilities included assessing budget proposals submitted by different government departments, ensuring that appropriations align with national priorities, and promoting fiscal responsibility.

Co’s contributions during this period were significant, particularly in relation to the development and approval of critical legislation. Notably, he co-authored an impressive total of 524 bills during the 19th Congress. This figure reflects not only his active participation in the legislative process but also his commitment to addressing the pressing needs of his constituents and the nation at large. His efforts encompassed a variety of issues, including education, health, and infrastructure, demonstrating his dedication to fostering comprehensive and sustainable growth.

The role of the Chairperson of the House Committee on Appropriations is crucial in shaping the financial landscape of the country. Co’s leadership facilitated transparent discussions regarding budget allocations, fostering collaboration among various stakeholders. His ability to navigate complex legislative processes allows for more effective governance and the cautious management of the nation’s resources. The decisions made under his chairmanship will have lasting implications for the Philippines, particularly in how funds are distributed and utilized to propel socio-economic development.

Transition and Political Endorsements

In February 2023, significant political endorsements emerged concerning the candidacy of Co for the position of Albay’s 2nd District Representative. A pivotal endorsement came from Joey Salceda, a prominent political figure and the incumbent representative who was term-limited. Salceda’s support for Co highlighted a strategic transition in leadership, as his decision was not merely a personal endorsement but one steeped in the political narrative of continuity and stability within the district.

The implications of this endorsement were manifold. Firstly, it signaled to constituents a seamless transition in governance, suggesting that Co would uphold the legislative priorities and initiatives that Salceda had previously championed. Moreover, Salceda’s backing lent Co not only credibility but also a substantial political capital essential for a successful campaign. Being associated with an established political figure offers novice candidates an invaluable advantage, fostering a sense of trust among voters who may otherwise be inclined to support familiar names or long-standing representatives.

Additionally, Co’s alignment with the Ako Bicol party further consolidates his position in the political landscape as he sets his sights on the upcoming 2025 elections. The Ako Bicol party has emerged as a potent force in Philippine politics, advocating for various developmental initiatives pertinent to the Bicol region. Co’s affiliation with this party aligns him with a coalition committed to addressing the unique challenges and aspirations of constituents, thereby reinforcing his candidacy’s resonance among voters. As a nominee for Ako Bicol, Co’s political journey is fortified by this collective vision, paving the way for effective governance in the future.

2025 Elections: Controversies and Accusations

The 2025 elections in the Philippines proved to be a contentious episode in the country’s political landscape, marked by numerous controversies and accusations surrounding various party-list groups. A prominent organization, Kontra Daya, publicly asserted that Ako Bicol, among others, failed to adequately represent the interests of the poor and marginalized sectors of society. Such claims elicited significant debate regarding the legitimacy and intentions of these party-list groups, which are purportedly designed to provide a voice to underrepresented demographics in the legislative process.

Kontra Daya’s accusations specifically highlight the alleged financial affiliations of Ako Bicol with large business entities, raising questions about the group’s commitment to advocating for those in dire need. These allegations suggest a disconnect between the party-list’s stated objectives and the realities of its financial support, thereby casting a shadow on its credibility. The potential influence of corporate interests within political representation cannot be overlooked, as it fundamentally challenges the democratic principle of serving the marginalized.

The ramifications of these claims extend beyond public perception; they significantly impact the political standing of leaders associated with Ako Bicol, particularly Co, who represents the party-list in Congress. As these controversies unfold, the constituency’s faith in Co’s advocacy may waver, ultimately affecting voter sentiments. The scrutiny placed upon Ako Bicol underscores the broader dialogue around political integrity and accountability, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding whom these political bodies truly serve.

As the elections approach, the landscape will likely become increasingly fraught with similar accusations, requiring political candidates like Co to navigate these challenges thoughtfully. Addressing controversies head-on will be vital for maintaining trust with constituents and reaffirming commitment to genuine representation of the marginalized populations they purport to serve.

Political Dynasty: The Co Family

The Co family has established a prominent presence in the political landscape of the Philippines, particularly within the local sphere. Their participation in governance extends across multiple generations, with various family members holding significant positions and influence. This political dynasty is characterized by its deep-rooted connections and ambitions, which have shaped local policies and community dynamics over the years.

Notably, the Co family has had a pivotal role in the local government, with several relatives elected into office during different Congressional terms. Their influence is often seen in legislative matters pertaining to their constituents, as well as in local governance where the family has prioritized political alliances that enhance their power. As such, the Co family has been able to maintain a commanding presence in Albay, illustrating the dynamics of political lineage in a rapidly evolving political context.

In addition to their political engagements, the Co family has significantly ventured into the business sector, particularly in quarrying operations. These endeavors have not been without controversy. The quarrying activities of the Co family are often cited as a contributing factor to environmental issues in the region, including the devastation wrought by the 2024 floods. Critics have argued that their operations have led to deforestation and increased vulnerability to natural disasters, raising questions about the balance between economic pursuits and environmental stewardship.

Despite the controversies, the Co family remains a formidable political force, embodying the intertwining of business interests and political power. Their legacy thus serves as a case study on the implications of political dynasties in the Philippines, illustrating how intertwined familial influence and local governance can impact both policy and the environment.

Retaining His Seat in the 20th Congress

The journey of Co in the political landscape of the Philippines continues as he prepares for representation in the 20th Congress starting in July 2025. His re-election signifies an ongoing commitment to his constituents, yet it comes with significant challenges that demand careful navigation. One of the most pressing issues Co faces is the growing controversy surrounding his perceived inactivity in plenary sessions during the previous congressional term.

Critics argue that this inactivity undermines the very essence of legislative representation. By not actively participating in discussions and debates, Co risks alienating his constituents who expect their elected officials to advocate for their interests rigorously. The lack of presence in the House may have broader implications for his district, as notable matters that might affect local welfare could be neglected due to his absence. This has sparked discussions among voters about accountability and the essential role of lawmakers in addressing their needs.

Moreover, the political landscape is evolving, and the expectations of elected officials have shifted. As a member of the 20th Congress, Co must demonstrate a renewed commitment to engagement and advocacy. His ability to represent his constituents effectively may hinge on how well he addresses past criticisms while also presenting a clear agenda for the future. Engaging with the community, prioritizing transparency, and being active in discussions are vital strategies Co must employ to regain trust and support.

The challenges ahead are not insurmountable, but they require a concerted effort to transform the narrative surrounding his leadership. By confronting the issues of inactivity and showing a willingness to engage meaningfully with both his fellow lawmakers and the electorate, Co can realign his focus on the needs of his constituents. The journey through the 20th Congress will thus be a critical test of his political resolve and responsiveness.

Implications of the 2025 Flood Control Project Scandal

The 2025 flood control project scandal has emerged as a significant event in the political landscape of the Philippines, with widespread implications for the involved parties. Central to this controversy is Co’s ownership of Sunwest, the contractor firm linked to the project. Accusations have surfaced claiming that Co used his political influence to secure contracts for Sunwest, raising concerns about corruption and lack of transparency in government dealings. As these allegations unfolded, questions regarding the integrity of the bidding process and the allocation of public funds have gained prominence.

The public’s reaction to the scandal has been predominantly negative, with many citizens expressing their discontent over perceived favoritism and the misuse of power. Social media platforms have become hotbeds for discussions surrounding the topic, leading to a surge in public scrutiny and activism. Grassroots movements have called for accountability, demanding thorough investigations into the dealings of public officials and their ties to private enterprises. The fallout from the scandal has significantly tarnished Co’s reputation, leading to calls for his resignation from several sectors of society.

Furthermore, the implications of this scandal extend beyond immediate public perception. It poses a challenge to Co’s political career, with opponents seizing the opportunity to question both his qualifications and character. The timing of the scandal is particularly crucial as it may affect voter sentiments in upcoming elections, shifting allegiances and impacting the backing of his political allies. As the narrative progresses, the scandal has the potential to reshape the political dynamics in the Philippines, prompting an urgent need for reforms in governance to restore public trust in elected officials.

Medical Leave and Political Controversy

In the midst of escalating political tensions in the Philippines, a notable incident involving a prominent political figure, Co, arose when he departed for the United States under the pretext of seeking medical treatment. His absence, occurring during a critical period, sparked considerable debate and controversy among political circles and constituents alike. The timing of his medical leave has led many to speculate whether it was a genuine health-related issue or a strategic maneuver to evade mounting scrutiny and opposition back home.

As Co journeyed to the United States, his political opponents seized upon the situation, framing his departure as a retreat from responsibility. Critics argued that his absence from crucial legislative sessions undermined the democratic process and prioritized personal interests over his obligations to the constituents who elected him. This perception was exacerbated by the political climate at the time, marked by heightened discussions on governance, accountability, and the responsibilities of elected officials. The juxtaposition of his purported medical needs against the backdrop of pressing political matters further fueled skepticism and dissent.

Constituents expressed mixed feelings regarding Co’s leave. Some sympathized with the potential health concerns faced by their representative, while others voiced disappointment and frustration, feeling abandoned during a pivotal phase of political discourse. Additionally, the media played a significant role in shaping public opinion, with various outlets covering the developments extensively, ensuring that the narrative surrounding Co’s medical leave continued to evolve as the situation unfolded.

Ultimately, Co’s medical trip to the United States became emblematic of the broader political controversies that plagued this period in the Philippines, raising questions about the integrity and accountability of public officials. Understanding the implications of this absence not only illuminates the intricate dynamics of political responsibility but also underscores the importance of transparency in governance during challenging times.

Resignation from the House of Representatives

The resignation of Co from the House of Representatives on September 29 marked a pivotal moment in the political landscape of the Philippines. This decision culminated after a series of events that showcased the underlying tensions within the legislative body. Following his resignation, newly elected House Speaker Bojie Dy took the significant step of revoking Co’s travel license. This action raised questions about the governance protocols and the extent of authority held by the Speaker in regulating the affairs of representatives. Co’s travel license had previously allowed him the flexibility to engage with his constituents and attend to party-political matters, hence its revocation was perceived as both a symbolic and practical blow to his effectiveness as a legislator.

The repercussions of this incident reached beyond Co’s personal political ambitions. Following the revocation, numerous factions within the Ako Bicol party-list began to express vocal demands for Co’s return to the legislature. The rallying cries for his reinstatement indicated widespread support among constituents who felt that Co’s contributions were invaluable to the progress of their advocacies. His resignation thus sparked debate about loyalty and representation in the political arena, particularly within the context of mission-driven party-list systems in the Philippines.

As discussions unfolded regarding the implications of Co’s departure, political analysts emphasized the potential impact of his resignation on his legacy. Co’s commitment to the Ako Bicol party-list was often articulated in terms of service to marginalized communities; consequently, this abrupt exit may alter the party’s long-term influence. Stakeholders have begun to ponder how this shift would shape the approaches and strategies of future party leaders, as well as the interconnectedness of political alliances moving forward. Ultimately, Co’s resignation not only signifies a personal juncture in his career but also catalyzes considerations around the evolving dynamics within Philippine politics.

The Pharmally and DepEd Laptop Controversy: Unraveling the Scandal of February 2024

The Pharmally scandal emerged in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing significant attention due to allegations of corruption and mishandling of public funds. Founded in 2016, Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corporation garnered widespread notoriety as a key supplier of medical supplies. The company became particularly controversial for its role in securing government contracts for personal protective equipment (PPE) and other vital supplies, which were purportedly sold at inflated prices. This inflated pricing raised serious concerns regarding the ethical standards behind government procurement processes during a public health crisis.

Key players in the scandal include Pharmally’s executives, who faced scrutiny over the contracts awarded to them by the Department of Health (DOH). The situation escalated further when Senate inquiries revealed that Pharmally’s awarded contracts amounted to billions of pesos. Critics pointed fingers at irregularities within the bidding processes, suggesting that these contracts favored Pharmally despite having a questionable financial background. This led to accusations of collusion between government officials and the company, triggering widespread public outrage and calls for accountability.

Adding a complex layer to the scandal, Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva voiced significant concerns regarding Pharmally’s dealings. His scrutiny focused on the company’s affiliations and legitimacy, which prompted deeper investigations into its ties with Sunwest Corporation—another entity embroiled in controversies. Villanueva’s concerns emphasized the broader implications of the scandal, including the potential misuse of taxpayer money and the overall governance of public health initiatives during a crisis.

The ramifications of the Pharmally affair continue to unfold, underscoring critical issues in government transparency and accountability. As investigations progress, the ongoing controversies challenge the integrity of the procurement system and the trust of the Philippine public in their leadership during unprecedented times.

Sunwest Corporation and the Department of Education Laptop Deal

The procurement of laptops for the Department of Education (DepEd) by Sunwest Corporation has ignited considerable public outcry due to allegations of inflated pricing and the provision of outdated devices. This controversial deal, which came under scrutiny in February 2024, raised significant concerns regarding ethical procurement practices and fiscal responsibility within government contracts. Reports indicate that the laptops supplied were not only overpriced but also failed to meet the technological advancement expected in contemporary educational settings. This raises questions about the due diligence exercised by DepEd during the procurement process.

The Office of the Ombudsman initiated an investigation into the matter, unearthing critical findings that suggested a pattern of malfeasance reminiscent of previous procurement scandals, specifically the Pharmally deal that shook the nation. The investigations indicated potential collusion between government entities and Sunwest Corporation, compelling many to connect the dots between these two incidents of alleged corruption. The involvement of industry leaders with ties to both contracts serves to intertwine the narratives, leading to increasing public distrust.

Furthermore, Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva’s allegations regarding forgery of his signature in the ombudsman case that was later dismissed have compounded the situation. These claims, if validated, would reveal an alarming distortion of accountability and governance within the procurement framework of the Department of Education. Such developments could suggest a broader conspiracy that might have undermined the integrity of various governmental contracts. The unfolding events call for vigilant oversight on public spending and dedicated efforts to pursue transparency in government-related transactions.

The National Budget Dispute and Political Implications

The national budget dispute that emerged in September 2024 has revealed significant fractures within the Philippine political landscape, particularly regarding the control and allocation of government resources. This contention was highlighted by legislators, most notably lawmaker co, who publicly questioned Vice President Sara Duterte’s assertions surrounding budget authority. Co’s challenge underscored a collective perspective among legislators, emphasizing that budgetary decisions are not solely within the purview of the executive office but rather are part of a broader legislative process that requires collaboration and consensus.

Co’s statements during this period drew attention to the absence of the Vice President during critical budget hearings, a move critics saw as indicative of either a lack of accountability or a disregard for the importance of a collaborative governance model. This absence became a focal point for co and other lawmakers, who argued that effective governance requires participation from all branches of government, especially on matters as crucial as budgetary allocations that directly impact public services, including the controversial procurement of laptops through the Pharmally deal.

The political ramifications of this dispute extend beyond the immediate conversation about budget control. The tensions between the executive and legislative branches highlight ongoing power dynamics that could influence future policymaking and governance strategies. Co’s challenge to Duterte’s narrative is representative of a broader desire among legislators to assert their authority in budgetary matters, a reflection of the evolving nature of political relationships in the current administration. As the discussions continue, the implications of this budget dispute will undoubtedly shape the legislative agenda moving forward, setting the stage for both cooperation and confrontation as the government navigates its fiscal responsibilities amidst rising public scrutiny and demands for transparency.

Future Outlook

In examining the Pharmally and DepEd laptop controversies that emerged in February 2024, it becomes clear that these events have sparked significant public concern regarding government procurement practices in the Philippines. The key points discussed emphasize the need for stringent oversight and enhanced regulatory frameworks to ensure accountability in government transactions. These controversies have not only raised questions about the propriety of the contracts but also about the integrity of those involved in the decision-making processes.

The fallout from these issues is likely to develop further as more details emerge and additional investigations are undertaken. Stakeholders, including civil society organizations and advocacy groups, are calling for comprehensive reviews and potential legal actions against those implicated. Such measures aim to ensure that any wrongdoing is adequately addressed, fostering a culture of responsibility among public officials aligning with the demand for ethical governance.

Moving forward, it is essential that the Department of Education (DepEd) and related government bodies engage in transparent communication with the public about the steps they are implementing to rectify these procurement failures. The implications of these scandals may extend into the political landscape, potentially influencing public opinion and voting behavior in future elections. Consequently, the government must prioritize transparency and accountability to rebuild public trust and confidence in its procurement procedures.

Ultimately, the lessons learned from the Pharmally and DepEd controversies should inform future policy reforms aimed at enhancing the rigor of government procurement processes. Ensuring that such incidents do not recur is critical for fostering a sustainable environment of trust between the government and its citizens. As the situation evolves, continued vigilance from both the public and regulatory bodies will be crucial in navigating the complexities surrounding these ongoing investigations.

Examining the Flood Control Funding Controversy Surrounding Co: A Timeline of Events

Background of the Flood Control Funding Issue

The flood control funding controversy has emerged as a significant topic within the context of disaster response and infrastructure development in the Bicol region. Initial statements made by the government of Co emphasized the commitment to adequate flood control measures, highlighting a supposed readiness to allocate sufficient resources for managing water-related disasters. These proclamations indicated a strong confidence in the existing financial framework designed to protect vulnerable communities from catastrophic flooding events.

However, these assertions were put under scrutiny following the findings from a comprehensive fact-check conducted by Vera Files. The investigation revealed stark discrepancies between Co’s claims about flood control funding and the actual situation on the ground. It was found that the anticipated allocations were either significantly lower than projected or had been misappropriated, thereby compromising the overall effectiveness of flood management initiatives in the region.

The implications of such discrepancies are profound, as flood control funding plays a critical role in safeguarding local populations and their livelihoods against the persistent threat posed by natural disasters. The lack of appropriate financing not only hinders immediate response capabilities but also affects long-term infrastructure resilience. As communities grapple with the consequences of insufficient funding for flood control programs, expectations for government accountability rise. This backdrop underscores the necessity to re-evaluate existing funding strategies and ensure that promised resources are accessible to those most in need.

Ultimately, understanding the context surrounding the flood control funding issue provides vital insights into the challenges faced by the Bicol region. It casts light on the urgent requirement for transparent financial management and effective government interventions to mitigate the adverse impacts of flooding, which remains a pressing concern for many residents.

Defense and Justifications: Co’s Response to Criticism

In the midst of growing criticism regarding the government’s funding decisions for flood control initiatives, Co has stepped forward, providing a rationale for redirecting financial resources towards water impounding facilities. He argues that investing in these facilities is paramount for enhancing food security, which he believes is a more pressing concern for the population than flood control projects at this time. Co posits that by improving food security, the government can create long-term resilience against disasters, ensuring that communities are better equipped to deal with the aftermath of flooding when it occurs.

Co’s defense is anchored in a broader perspective, suggesting that a strategic reallocation of funds is necessary to address complex and interrelated issues. He asserts that flood control measures, while essential, can often take a back seat when immediate challenges such as food scarcity arise. This argument resonates with some segments of the population, who see the merit in prioritizing basic needs over infrastructure projects that may take years to yield results. However, critics argue that neglecting flood control can lead to dire consequences for many communities vulnerable to severe weather events.

The implications of Co’s funding strategy extend beyond immediate concerns. Public perception of the government’s accountability is at stake, as citizens question the prioritization of resources in the face of natural disasters. While some view the emphasis on food security as a necessary adjustment, others express skepticism about the long-term efficacy of such strategies without adequate flood control measures in place. In this context, Co’s position raises significant questions about the balance between addressing immediate needs and ensuring the safety and welfare of a population prone to flooding.

The Allegations of Corruption: Co’s Family Ties and Government Contracts

The controversy surrounding flood control funding has brought to light serious allegations of corruption linked to Co, who holds a prominent role as the chair of the House Appropriations Committee. Central to these allegations are the substantial government contracts awarded to construction firms with familial ties to Co, amounting to a staggering ₱15.7 billion. This situation raises critical questions regarding potential conflicts of interest and suggests a pattern of favoritism in governmental dealings.

Critics argue that Co’s influence within the appropriations committee has permitted the flow of essential funding toward initiatives that benefit his family’s business interests. Such transactions, perceived as mired in impropriety, have sparked a broader discussion regarding transparency and accountability in government contracts. Various construction firms, reportedly connected to Co, have been awarded contracts without a competitive bidding process, subsequently drawing scrutiny from both governmental watchdogs and the public.

This intertwining of governmental roles and family business interests represents a concerning breach of ethical standards. The potential for abusive practices highlights the urgent need for strict regulation and oversight in the awarding of government contracts, especially for projects such as flood control that directly impact the safety and well-being of the community. Moreover, these allegations serve to invoke a larger dialogue regarding the systemic issues of corruption that persist within governmental institutions.

Given Co’s significant leadership position, the implications of these alleged actions could far-reaching consequences, influencing perceptions of legislative integrity and public trust. The question remains whether adequate measures will be taken to investigate these allegations comprehensively and ensure that public funding is allocated impartially, devoid of nepotism or undue influence.

Consequences and Developments: From Resignation to Admissions

The controversy surrounding Co escalated significantly in the latter part of 2025, culminating in a series of pivotal events that shaped public discourse on governance and accountability. Following escalating scrutiny and mounting corruption allegations, Co resigned from his position in the House of Representatives. His resignation came as a shock to many, as he had long maintained a robust political profile. This abrupt departure from office marked a turning point in the public’s perception of political integrity.

In the wake of his resignation, significant measures were initiated against Co, underscoring the seriousness of the allegations. The Anti-Money Laundering Council took immediate action by freezing his assets, which were believed to be linked to fraudulent activities. This decision reflected a growing commitment to tackling corruption and holding public officials accountable for their actions. Additionally, Co’s travel clearance was revoked, effectively preventing him from leaving the country and emphasizing the government’s desire to investigate the matter thoroughly.

Further developments unfolded in November 2025, when a video surfaced featuring Co making startling admissions pertaining to budget insertions. This revelation brought to light the manipulative practices that may have compromised the funding mechanisms intended for flood control and other essential public services. The implications of his acknowledgments were profound, instigating a wider conversation about transparency and the ethical conduct of elected officials. As the scandal continued to unfold, it became increasingly clear that the ramifications extended beyond Co’s personal fate; it posed a serious challenge to public trust in government institutions.

This sequence of events has sparked a debate surrounding legislative accountability and the effectiveness of existing checks and balances. The fallout from Co’s actions serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the need for ongoing vigilance in governance and the critical role of public engagement in safeguarding against corruption.

References

1.  “Elizaldy Co”. Rappler. September 4, 2025. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
2.  “Elizaldy S. Co profile”. Superbrands. Retrieved November 6, 2024.
3.  De Leon, Dwight; Valmonte, Kaycee (March 7, 2025). “Mapping the scandal-plagued business fortunes of Zaldy Co”. Rappler. Archived from the original on March 7, 2025.
4.  Baclig, Cristina Eloisa (September 18, 2025). “The congressman and the billions: Tracing the power of Zaldy Co”. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
5.  Belen, Job (February 2, 2002). “Cargo boat sinks off Albay; 5 passengers rescued, 1 missing”. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Sto. Domingo, Albay. p. A14. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
6.  Pareño, Roel; Etolle, Nestor (February 3, 2002). “Cargo ship with 70 aboard missing”. Philstar.com. Zamboanga City. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
7.  Barcia, Rhaydz B. (June 1, 2007). “Government losing billions in spurious projects in Albay”. The Manila Times. Legazpi City. p. A6. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
8.  Barcia, Rhaydz B. (June 10, 2008). “Thousands attend ERC hearing in Catanduanes”. The Manila Times. p. A6. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
9.  “Philippines government OK’s new project”. UPI. June 27, 2008. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
10.  “Aquino turns on Catanduanes power plants”. Inquirer.net. May 4, 2012. Retrieved September 27, 2025. The Solong and Hitoma plants started soft operations in late 2010 and early 2011, respectively.
11.  “Hyatt Regency sold; to reopen as hotel-casino”. Marianas Business Journal. December 20, 2009. Archived from the original on September 4, 2022. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
12.  Hallig, Lester Gopela (March 13, 2011). “The Midas touch”. The Philippine Star. Retrieved October 13, 2022.
13.  Ugalde, Manilyn (September 15, 2013). “Residents cry ‘foul’ over ghost bridge project in Albay town”. PNA. Both the Kilikao and Mariawa projects were under contract with Hi-Tone Construction and implemented by the DPWH regional office, according to records.
14.  “PHOTO ESSAY: Mga ‘di kumpletong road project at multi-purpose building sa Albay, Lanao del Sur”. GMA News Online. September 23, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
15.  “‘Ahensiyasat: DPWH’ sa special report ng ‘Reporter’s Notebook'”. GMA News Online. October 7, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
16.  Ugalde, Manny T. (October 10, 2013). “Mouthpiece says DPWH produces too many millionaires”. The Manila Times. Legazpi, Albay. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
17.  “‘Pork’ contractors in dubious deals escape govt blacklist”. The Manila Times. June 11, 2014. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
18.  “AKB Rep at Sunwest Corp Founder Zaldy Co, sinagot ang pagkakakaladkad ng kanyang kumpanya sa Pharmally issue” [AKB Rep and Sunwest Corp Founder Zaldy Co, answer his company dragging into the Pharmally issue]. Brigada News (in Filipino). September 15, 2021. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
19.  “Pharmally leads 10 firms that got biggest pandemic contracts, group says”. The Philippine Star. October 14, 2021. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
20.  De Leon, Dwight (March 8, 2025). “Zaldy Co still ‘beneficial owner’ of scandal-ridden public works contractor”. Rappler. Retrieved September 4, 2025.
21.  Rodan, Garry (2018). “6: The Philippines’ Party-list System, Reformers, and Oligarchs”. Participation Without Democracy: Containing Conflict in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. p. 127. ISBN 9781501720130. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
22.  Torres, Tetch (October 30, 2012). “SC urged to nullify Comelec order disqualifying Ako Bicol”. Inquirer.net. Manila, Philippines. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
23.  Atong Paglaum, Inc. vs. Commission on Elections, Supreme Court E-library (April 2, 2013).
24.  Diaz, Jess (July 2, 2010). “Ako Bicol vows to support Aquino administration”. Philstar.com. Manila, Philippines. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
25.  Romero, Purple S. (November 13, 2012). “SC stops disqualification of Ako Bicol, 3 others”. Rappler. Manila, Philippines. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
26.  Merueñas, Mark (April 5, 2013). “SC: Party-lists need not represent marginalized sectors”. GMA News Online. Retrieved September 27, 2025.
27.  “House of Representatives Member Profile”. Congress.gov.ph. Retrieved November 6, 2024.
28.  “House Committee on Appropriations”. Congress.gov.ph. Retrieved November 6, 2024.
29.  Lalu, Gabriel Pabico (January 13, 2025). “Rep. Co removed from House appropriations post”. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
30.  de Leon, Dwight (June 30, 2025). “Your lawmaker filed either hundreds, or just a few bills. So what?”. Rappler. Archived from the original on June 30, 2025. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
31.  “Salceda endorses Co as successor in 2025”. Manila Bulletin. February 6, 2023. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
32.  Cruz, RG. “Party-lists flagged for links to businesses, political clans point to track record”. ABS-CBN News. Archived from the original on March 15, 2025. Retrieved October 8, 2025.
33.  Balonzo, Reinnard; Armeña, Rosmae Ysabel (April 26, 2025). “In typhoon-hit Bicol, political clans aiding victims backed projects blamed for flooding”. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Retrieved October 8, 2025.
34.  de Leon, Dwight (September 3, 2025). “Where is Zaldy Co?”. Rappler. Archived from the original on September 3, 2025.
35.  Porcalla, Delon (August 12, 2025). “Silence from House on list of contractors”. The Philippine Star. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
36.  Baclig, Cristina Eloisa (September 19, 2025). “Zaldy Co in the eye of the flood control super typhoon”. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
37.  de Leon, Dwight (September 4, 2025). “House confirms Zaldy Co in US for medical treatment”. Rappler. Archived from the original on September 4, 2025. Retrieved September 22, 2025.
38.  Subingsubing, Krixia (September 19, 2025). “Dy’s first move as speaker: Zaldy Co told to return in 10 days”. INQUIRER.net. Retrieved September 20, 2025.
39.  “Zaldy Co resigns amid flood control projects investigation”. GMA News Online. Retrieved September 29, 2025.
40.  Hana Bordey (February 12, 2024). “Villanueva hits back at Zaldy Co: Your company is linked to Pharmally, DepEd laptop controversies”. GMA Integrated News.
41.  Latoza, Guinevere (August 31, 2025). “Five Reveals from the Flood-Control Data”. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Retrieved September 25, 2025.
42.  Lalu, Gabriel Pabico (September 10, 2024). “Co, other solons dispute VP Sara’s claim of 2 execs controlling budget”. Philippine Daily Inquirer.
43.  “Fact Check: Co falsely claims ‘no billion-peso’ funding for flood control in Bicol”. Vera Files. November 5, 2024.
44.  Oliquino, Edjen (October 25, 2024). “Co counters claims on Bicol’s multi-billion peso flood control budget”. Daily Tribune.
45.  Garcia, Patrick (September 25, 2025). “Rep. Zaldy Co’s Wikipedia Details Tampered”. Manila Bulletin. Archived from the original on September 25, 2025. Retrieved September 25, 2025.
46.  Punzalan, Jamaine. “Speaker revokes Zaldy Co’s travel clearance, orders his immediate return | ABS-CBN News”. ABS-CBN. Archived from the original on September 19, 2025. Retrieved September 28, 2025.
47.  Cruz, James Patrick (September 24, 2025). “What’s in Zaldy Co’s hangar? P4.7-billion worth of aircraft linked to his firms”. Rappler. Retrieved September 28, 2025.
48.  Bolledo, Jairo (September 26, 2025). “Interpol Blue Notice sought to track Zaldy Co’s whereabouts”. Rappler. Retrieved September 28, 2025.
49.  “Zaldy Co resigns from House of Representatives”. GMA News Online. September 29, 2025. Retrieved September 29, 2025.
50.  Hilotin, Jay (November 14, 2025). “Philippines corruption shockwave: Ex-lawmaker Zaldy Co admits to $1.69-billion budget insertion, pins down Marcos Jr, cousin Romualdez — what happens next”. Gulf News.
51.  Panti, Llanesca T. (November 14, 2025). “Zaldy Co tags Marcos, Romualdez in alleged P100-B budget ‘insertions'”. GMA News.
52.  “Contractors snare billions for laptops, PPEs, elections” (PDF). Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. Right to Know, Right Now! Coalition. Retrieved September 18, 2025.
53.  “PNB partners with Sunwestville”. Philippine Daily Inquirer. December 5, 2007. p. B8. Retrieved September 27, 2025.